Re: boolean sequence

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Juergen Luethje wrote:

> Also, since the whole thing is 1-based now, 0 could beused instead of -1,
> in order to indicate, that find_byte_... didn't find the given value.
> What do you think?

i agree, same as eu's find ().

> > if you are planning to release a lib out of these functions,
> 
> Maybe...
> I'll only do so, if I find some nice, self-explanatory function names,
> and when I have the time to write a sufficient documentation.

i agreee that good function names are important, especially for a library.
 

> Maybe I should add pack/unpack functions? Then the user can "unpack" a
> byte array to a normal sequence, use any existing function that (s)he
> wants, and then "re-pack" the normal sequence, to get again a byte
> array.

yes, pack and unpack functions will be also needed. i also thought of that
later.

your byte code from other post looks good. thanks.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu