OpenEuphoria

Re: Still no better trace eval

• Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Feb 26, 2003
• 512 views

On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:20:33 -0500, Robert Craig
<rds at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:

>If I did implement x[20], you'd probably ask
>why x[i] doesn't work. Then I'd do x[i], and you'd
>ask why x[i+1] doesn't work.

I'd want to know why

	? find(upper(line[i]),map[myFunc(j)])

doesn't work )

I know it doesn't work this way (yet), but I'd like to see in say

	if <expr1> op <expr2>

some way to select "op", or an inbuilt or user-defined function or
procedure name, and the debugger trap showing the actual parameter
values it is about to apply it to (each and every time "op" is
applied, until I cancel the trap).

Would that be feasible at all?

Pete