Re: Still no better trace eval

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

aku saya wrote:
> Why is still not a such trace evaluation such as x[20]?
> I think it is not very difficult for Rob to implement...

It's not too hard, but in 2.4 you can display/scroll
entire large sequences in pretty print mode.

If I did implement x[20], you'd probably ask
why x[i] doesn't work. Then I'd do x[i], and you'd
ask why x[i+1] doesn't work. It would be
hard to evaluate general expressions in the middle
of debugging, without a major change to the interpreter.
Maybe some day...

Regards,
    Rob Craig
    Rapid Deployment Software
    http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu