RE: 2.4 speed

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Ok Robert, I've isolated the "slowness" problem to a simple example, did 
some tests and am emailing you the code and results.

-- Andy

Robert Elia wrote:
> At 08:07 PM 2/22/03 +0000, you wrote:
> 
> >
> >More testing an a completely different program than the one I referred
> >to in my last post (no wacky math this time), but one which creates and
> >destroys lots of small to medium size sequences shows 2.4 being 5% or so
> >slower than 2.3.  2.4 is also using 2MB less memory (according to my
> >toolbar) than the same program on 2.3, so once I again I assume this has
> >something to do with memory management/garabage collection...
> 
>          One of my programs which has a long initialization time starts up 
> twice as fast under ex.exe 2.4 :)>  but another, which parses EU source 
> and 
> builds a database (in memory), took 53 seconds with 2.4 but only 22 
> seconds 
> with 2.3 doing that function.  :(>  I did the two tests in separate dos 
> boxes several times in succession to try to minimize disk cache effects.
> 
>          Does ex.exe also use these Win API memory routines when running in 
> a dos box?
> 
>                                  Bob
> 
>

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu