RE: 2.4 speed
- Posted by Andy Serpa <ac at onehorseshy.com> Feb 24, 2003
- 384 views
Ok Robert, I've isolated the "slowness" problem to a simple example, did some tests and am emailing you the code and results. -- Andy Robert Elia wrote: > At 08:07 PM 2/22/03 +0000, you wrote: > > > > >More testing an a completely different program than the one I referred > >to in my last post (no wacky math this time), but one which creates and > >destroys lots of small to medium size sequences shows 2.4 being 5% or so > >slower than 2.3. 2.4 is also using 2MB less memory (according to my > >toolbar) than the same program on 2.3, so once I again I assume this has > >something to do with memory management/garabage collection... > > One of my programs which has a long initialization time starts up > twice as fast under ex.exe 2.4 :)> but another, which parses EU source > and > builds a database (in memory), took 53 seconds with 2.4 but only 22 > seconds > with 2.3 doing that function. :(> I did the two tests in separate dos > boxes several times in succession to try to minimize disk cache effects. > > Does ex.exe also use these Win API memory routines when running in > a dos box? > > Bob > >