Re: Suggestion for 2.5
- Posted by Martin Stachon <martin.stachon at worldonline.cz> Feb 21, 2003
- 417 views
Christian CUVIER wrote: > > Some other indeterminate forms are : > > 0^0 (although MS Windows Calculator says 0^0=1, my Casio says "Math error" > >> > 1 is correct, because epsilon^0 is always 1. Some problems arise when defining 0^0=1 : log(0^0) = 0*log(0) -- not defined (0^1)/(0^1) = 0^(1-1) = 0^0 = 1 -- but this is 0/0, indeterminate natural n-th power of a is defined as: a^n = a*a^(n-1) This way, 0^0=0*0^(-1)=0*inf -- indeterminate There is also a proof using the fact that : lim_(x->0) 0^x = 0 lim_(x->0) x^0 = 1 But I don't understand it (we haven't been taught using limits yet). Martin