RE: Back to Bach
- Posted by kbochert at copper.net Feb 20, 2003
- 482 views
-------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998- You wrote on 2/19/03 8:54:57 PM: >> >>Karl: >> Will you please comment on the intended features of Bell=3F >> The driving goal is that Bell should be a language for amateurs. It should be powerful but not obscure or surprising. Speed is very important. >Please. >I have done a good bit of mirc scripting the last two weeks, but no Eu >code. No, mirc isn't perfect, but neither is Eu. I'd pay a lot more > to see the two >blended together, but i said that years ago. > >I have the flu and a fever, mirc is easier. > >Kat > Can you point me to an address for mirc=3F Here are some features of my vaporware: 1) Datatypes: var (object) int (integer) -- 32-bit, suitable for pointers real (atom) list (sequence) string class dictionary -- probably not at first block=3F=3F -- a block of memory for interfacing with C 2) Classes (like Bach) 3) Exceptions (like Bach) 4) Rigid indentation (like Python) 5) Some keywords persistant callback coroutine foreach export import rename .. as goto continue exit 6) All subroutines are functions. The variable '$result' always holds the return value of the most recently executed function. 7) Function parameters are read-only 8) ... many 'small' features Perhaps this topic should be on OpenEU=3F=3F Karl -------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998---