OpenEuphoria

Re: Back to Bach

• Posted by kbochert at copper.net Feb 20, 2003
• 404 views

-------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998-

KAT wrote on 2/19/03 2:37:47 PM:

>It's now known as BLISS.
>Then that was discontinued too.
>
Actually it started as Bliss, then changed to Bach on the
discovery that there were several Bliss's already.

>I'd love to have the source, so i can see how 
>Karl did his magic, i have the official RDS source already.

Given that development has ceased, I am now willing to give away
the source to purchasers of Bach. Unfortunately, I am uncertain how
to verify purchase of RDS source, securely transmit it, or what to
say in a license.


>And with debugging, stepping thru code line by line with the interpreter, 
>etc=3F I still like the olde TurboPascal IDE.
>
I have, foolishly, begun sporadic work my own new interpreter. It will have
all new code, and while it was originally intended to be able to run
Euphoria programs, it has evolved into something substantially different.
( The moment you accept one incompatibiity, others flood in!).
It is tentatively named Bell (The icon is a 'not-equals' sign -- does
anyone know why=3F).
The addition of an IDE/Debugger is one of the prime reasons for taking
on this labor.

Karl

-------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998---