OpenEuphoria

Re: Back to Bach

• Posted by gertie at visionsix.com Feb 19, 2003
• 402 views

On 19 Feb 2003, at 19:57, SR.Williamson wrote:

> 
> Haven't been keeping up with Eu much recently. Am I correct in 
> understanding that Bach is dead?

It's now known as BLISS.
Then that was discontinued too. I'd love to have the source, so i can see how 
Karl did his magic, i have the official RDS source already.
Oh, there is now the OpenEu project, which i am not involved in.
 
> Not that I could get it to run anyway, but I was very much interested in 
> trying it out - it had a couple of features I was very interested in 
> seeing in Eu.

Me too!
Ditto for OpenEu, but while Karl quickly added the new stuff to Bach/Bliss, 
the OpenEu project turned it all down flat. Maybe if you had suggested it to 
them, SR.
 
> One thing it did not have though, is the ability to bind to the Bach 
> interpreter. Was this a problem with the licensing of the source? Is it 
> necessarily fatal, IOW, isn't there some way of licensing that could be 
> worked out so that some variations of the Eu interpreter could be sold?

And with debugging, stepping thru code line by line with the interpreter, etc? 
I still like the olde TurboPascal IDE.

Kat