Re: suggestion sequence section
On Friday 07 February 2003 04:29 pm, you wrote:
>
> Doing that now, simple matches and tests for type. What is your argueme=
nt
> against my suggestion to include this form in the language, where it co=
uld
> be done faster?
Well, my questions are:
1. would it be truly faster, and if so, how much faster?
2. would it be easier to code?
> > I think the results you want can be obtained, but maybe not the way y=
ou
> > want to obtain them...?
>
> That can be said for almost anything.
Except goto's... ;)
> It's so good to know anything i
> suggest will be shot down...
The fact is, until I understand more clearly where you're coming from, of=
=20
COURSE I'm going to suggest alternate methods/algorithms. I expect ANYBOD=
Y=20
who asks a question about EUPHORIA on this list would be willing to accep=
t=20
answers to the positive and/or negative, including suggestions for how to=
do=20
something differently than proposed. Since I wasn't clear on what you wer=
e=20
currently doing, I offered a "work around" for the moment. You obviously=20
didn't need that. Shall I assume in the future that your questions are=20
rhetorical, because nobody can seem to offer you a pleasant enough answer=
=2E
> saves me from expecting anything till next year
> when someone else suggests it and it's accepted at that time.
How about in the future you contact someone on the list and ask them to p=
ost a=20
suggestion for you? Then maybe you'll see all your wonderful ideas come t=
o=20
fruition!
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
