Re: suggestion sequence section

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On 7 Feb 2003, at 15:53, C. K. Lester wrote:

> 
> > s = "abcdefgh"
> > x = "1..2"
> > ? s[x]
> >
> > This only borders on string execution.
> 
> I'm sure there's a reason, so I want to know why you can't go:
> 
>     s = "abcdefgh"
>     x = 1
>     y = 2
>     ?s[x..y]
> 
> or use an eXtractSequence function:
> 
>     s = "abcdefgh"
>     x = "1..2"
>     ? es( s, x )
> 
> where x can be an object... you'll just have to parse it out, which won't be
> too
> difficult.

Doing that now, simple matches and tests for type. What is your arguement 
against my suggestion to include this form in the language, where it could be 
done faster?
 
> I think the results you want can be obtained, but maybe not the way you want
> to
> obtain them...?

That can be said for almost anything. It's so good to know anything i suggest 
will be shot down, saves me from expecting anything till next year when 
someone else suggests it and it's accepted at that time. I am aware people 
will dismiss anything i say, merely because i am the one saying it, but at 
least the idea is out there, and someone else can add it to their calendar to 
bring it up again next year.

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu