Re: To everyone who is active at the euforum
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:05:39 +0200, "Tomas Toresson"
<toressonodakra at swipnet.se> wrote:
>
>Do you mean this message? :
You would have struggled to make it harder to read, but no, that was
not the message I had in mind.
You've posted already to EUforum, so I will cc this to the list and
trust that causes no problem.
If it got down to it, I really would stand by what I said:
>Check your facts. Robert stated that this will be easy to fix in the
>new front-end, and has also promised to look more carefully at the
>"include issue" as soon as he starts planning 2.6. His last post on
>the matter was just three days ago, on October 21st.
But that is not the point. Beating Rob over the head with what he
already knows, in short spasm, will achieve nothing.
If you want to make a difference, seriously, compose a "top ten", or
top hundred, list of issues that you want dealt with. And set up a web
site for it.
Anyone interested in Euphoria can "vote". Each "voter" can have
**ONE** succinct phrase/paragraph to record their feelings (editable
as many times as needed, but *without* a changelog)
If you "cheat" and suddenly have 735 votes for a topic, it will be
blatently obvious. Plus, if any "voter" does do not regularly
participate on EUforum, their opinion will naturally be disregarded.
What you need to do is get over "Chris said", "Derek said", "Pete
said", etc, and record the *actual* wishes of each voter.
I think you know what I mean. Open, lively, confrontontational
discussion on EUforum is great. What is needed is for each participant
to record one, finalised (max 50 words!) statement somewhere.
I hope this gives you an idea, or two.
I, too, want change, and/or focus on the things that should be
changed, as much as you, I just disagreed with your approach.
Regards,
Pete
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
