OpenEuphoria

RE: Contest

• Posted by Chris Bensler <bensler at nt.net> Oct 28, 2004
• 493 views

Andy Serpa wrote:
> 
> 
> posted by: Andy Serpa <ac at onehorseshy.com>
> 
> 
> 512 *KB*?  Under Windows?  That can't be right.  You can't even turn on 
> Windows with less than 64MB these days.  It is hard to imagine any 
> system having less than 256MB.
> 
> What OS, by the way?  Euphoria 2.4 under 98/ME has a number of 
> idiosycrancies with memory allocation/deallocation that don't exist 
> (much) under XP.  This was caused when Rob switched to using the Windows 
> malloc instead of the Watcom malloc...

Have you ever seen a 512KB ram stick, that would run on any machine 
capable of running windows?
I didn't think so.

I've never even seen < 1MB sticks for 286's.
Actually, I can't recall ever seeing a 512Kb ram stick! :)

C'mon now, enough with the brainless question :P

Chris Bensler
Code is Alchemy