RE: The Perfect Solution

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

codepilot Gmail Account wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:00:55 -0700, Matt Lewis <guest at rapideuphoria.com> 
> wrote:
> > 
> > posted by: Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at yahoo.com>
> > 
> > Chris Bensler wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Matt Lewis wrote:
> <snip>
> > 
> > What are these 'strongly opposed' attempts at breaking RDS's monopoly.
> 
> Can someone tell me why there are so many 'strongly opposed'  attempts
> at breaking RDS's monopoly. After all RDS did make euphoria, to start
> with and has gathered the croud thats here, listened(maybe no
> implemented) to suggestions. I'm personally very satisfied, and all
> the changes I've seen so far are probably place for pre-processors and
> DIY libraries. But the changes that can only be made to the
> interpreter, well they should be made to the interpreter, all of them.
> But certainly not the public or registered version, everyone that has
> been voicing there opions about changes SHOULD licence the source, and
> make them, themselves. If the changes make a huge impression then they
> will probably be added.
> 
> -Its late and I'm voicing my opinions, but hey I got the source and
> make the changes I like to it myself.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> > There have been a few message board attempts, and there are several
> > people working on an open source implementation of Euphoria.
> > 
> > The message boards go away because they're not as useful as this forum.
> > Some people like to get their messages by email.  There is a much wider
> > user base for this forum than the others (a chicken and the egg 
> > scenario).
> > It's easier to check one source than many.  That doesn't stop people 
> > from
> > using them, but it also doesn't mean that they're strongly opposed.  
> > Yes,
> > it does help that this is the Official forum, but it's not like Rob
> > censors people (at least not on-topic messages).
> > 
> > Frankly, I'm for more choices.  I don't understand why you think
> > otherwise.
> > 
> > Matt Lewis
> > 
> > 

If I pay for the source code, so that I can affect change to the 
euphoria language, I won't be sharing my improvements for free. 
ESPECIALLY with RDS, who was so bold as to CHARGE me to try and help 
them in the first place.
That is not attitude to make. "Everyone should just buy a copy of the 
source and make their own changes."
No way, that doesn't jive with me. I'm not interested in wasting money 
on the source code for an interpreter.
Besides people have tried that. Rob is just as stubborn. And the 
community won't even give those alternates a chances, mainly because the 
mod versions are crippled. As in no registered features.


Chris Bensler
Code is Alchemy

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu