Re: The Perfect Solution
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:00:55 -0700, Matt Lewis <guest at rapideuphoria.com>
wrote:
>
> posted by: Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at yahoo.com>
>
> Chris Bensler wrote:
> >
> >
> > Matt Lewis wrote:
<snip>
>
> What are these 'strongly opposed' attempts at breaking RDS's monopoly.
Can someone tell me why there are so many 'strongly opposed' attempts
at breaking RDS's monopoly. After all RDS did make euphoria, to start
with and has gathered the croud thats here, listened(maybe no
implemented) to suggestions. I'm personally very satisfied, and all
the changes I've seen so far are probably place for pre-processors and
DIY libraries. But the changes that can only be made to the
interpreter, well they should be made to the interpreter, all of them.
But certainly not the public or registered version, everyone that has
been voicing there opions about changes SHOULD licence the source, and
make them, themselves. If the changes make a huge impression then they
will probably be added.
-Its late and I'm voicing my opinions, but hey I got the source and
make the changes I like to it myself.
Daniel
> There have been a few message board attempts, and there are several
> people working on an open source implementation of Euphoria.
>
> The message boards go away because they're not as useful as this forum.
> Some people like to get their messages by email. There is a much wider
> user base for this forum than the others (a chicken and the egg scenario).
> It's easier to check one source than many. That doesn't stop people from
> using them, but it also doesn't mean that they're strongly opposed. Yes,
> it does help that this is the Official forum, but it's not like Rob
> censors people (at least not on-topic messages).
>
> Frankly, I'm for more choices. I don't understand why you think
> otherwise.
>
> Matt Lewis
>
>
>
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
