RE: include statement bugs
Igor Kachan wrote:
>
>
> Chris Bensler wrote:
>
> Igor Kachan wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
> [OT snipped]
>
> > > No, I do not. It seems, Chris are saying about stupidity.
> > > So, he is the most educated and very-very clever here.
> > > Isn't he? I do not think so, - that he is not.
> >
> > There are many people much more intelligent than me, and I give them the
> > respect they deserve. However, people like Robert Craig deserve a swift
> > kick in the head. Maybe it would shake loose that tidbit of wisdom he
> > used to have.
>
> All people have strongly identical rights on respectation.
> Is it a big news for you?
>
> [old stuff snipped]
>
> > I'm sorry I mentioned my std library project, it was an EXAMPLE! God
> > dammit! I could care less if it's vaporware, and even a bad idea.
> > It was an EXAMPLE!
>
>
> I do not see a problem here.
>
>
> > > Ok, it is great, I like competition, but he doesn't
> > > say about competition.
> > > He just wanted replace the standard copyrighted PD stuff
> > > with some unknown stuff without any explanation,
> > > what is so bad in the old well tested libraries.
> > >
> > > Reread, please, this thread to be sure about his problem.
> >
> > I never said any such thing, that I intend to 'replace' the RDS libs.
> > I have the authority to do that.!?
> > I said I am producing an alternative. There is a big difference there. I
> > said I would like it if people were able to use both at once if they
> > wanted. But I don't really care if they are compatible.
> >
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> >
> > > More than 1300 at all, but the specialized section
> > > is not that big. And it is the very interesting.
> > > If someone wants to be a writer of Euphoria
> > > libraries - that section is the exclusively interesting
> > > and rich on ideas.
> >
> > 1300? Other langauges have 130,000 or even 1,300,000.
> > PHP is half the age of Euphoria, and has at least 100x more source code
> > available for it.
>
> Use PHP please, what a problem?
>
> Do you program an application for Euphoria, or Euphoria itself?
>
> If you want program Euphoria itself, pay for source code and
> program all you want accordingly to licence.
>
> 2.5 will have 100% Euphoria front-end blok just for such
> unusual ideas like extremely rare using of different
> libraries with duplicated names.
>
> [old stuff snipped]
>
> > Thankyou Alexander. You hit the nail on the head. It's not even about
> > the names of the files themselves. But about our ability to organize our
> > Euphoria source code more adequately.
> > The fact that we can't use duplicate names, and the fact that Euphoria
> > doesn't recognize paths, are the consequential flaws that bring the
> > issue to the table.
> >
> >
> > > No, it is not his problem.
> >
> >
> > YES, that IS my problem.
> > How many times do I have to say it Igor. My std libraries are an
> > EXAMPLE!
>
> See, please, the subject of this thread once more.
> Chris, Euphoria does recognize paths very well and does the things
> as it is documented.
> >From any valid path it only uses the most important, almost
> always copyrighted part - own name of the included library.
> And doesn't include the second library with same name.
>
> What about apologies for RDS and Robert H. Craig personally?
>
> > > But c:\rds\file.e is copirighted standard library,
> >
> >
> > No it isn't. file.e is absolutely public domain. Do as you please.
> > You don't even have to give RDS any credit for using it, even if you
> > modify it.
>
> It is copyrighted as Public Domain by RDS.
>
> RDS allows to give credit or not, it is RDS' right.
>
> But I do not think someone does like insultings
> for his Public Domain + excellent production.
>
> You must go away with thanks or silently, if you do not
> like free fish & chips.
>
> Is it a big news for you?
>
> What about apologies for RDS and Robert H. Craig personally?
>
> > > and c:\chris\file.e is unknow for now some Chris's
> > > or someone's else untested library.
> > >
<snip>
I'm just going to do like Derek says he does, and ignore you.
This discussion is not goin anywhere.
I don't feel I owe RDS an apology, until Robert Craig recognizes the
needs of his Euphoria community. Not MY needs. Just because I may
address an issue, does not make it MY issue.
Enough said. End of discussion.
Chris Bensler
Code is Alchemy
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
