OpenEuphoria

Re: Multitask Feedback

• Posted by Bob Thompson <rthompson at rthompson.karoo.co.uk> Sep 22, 2005
• 441 views

Hayden McKay wrote:
> 
> I like the functions and concept of the new multitasking library. However I
> would like to see this remain as an optional only. I'm strongly against the
> idea of craming the Interpretor with stuff that would not get used on a day
> to day basis.
> 
> P.S. I like it very much though.
> 


I really like the code as well - it's simple to understand and implement
 - a lot easier than a programme I wrote using two shells communicating
through memshare. As Rob says, it's a judgement call where it should be
implemented and such a call can only be made quantitatively.

It would be a shame to have its efficiency impaired if it wasn't built in.

Regards,

Bob