Re: private include files
- Posted by Patrick Barnes <mrtrick at gmail.com> Oct 12, 2004
- 427 views
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:04:42 -0400, Greg Haberek <ghaberek at gmail.com> wrote: > Or maybe a slightly different approach: inline files. Upon reaching > keyword 'inline' the Interpreter continues to parse that file as if it > were in the local file, yet keeping track of separate line numbers, > etc.. > > inline myfile.e -- file is inserted inline at this position Syntactically nicer than include, I suppose... It'd have to be a link, not a physical 'inlining', or the executable file would be larger than necessary. -- MrTrick