Re: Sorting by sequence member`

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Thanks Kat, I didn't want to sort the atoms.
The function Juergen sent is doing what I want.

Thanks everyone


On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:27:16 -0500, Kat <gertie at visionsix.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10 Oct 2004, at 18:25, Tony Steward wrote:
> 
> >
> > Kat your sorttok doesn't seem to like my data layout (i think) as it
> > returns nothing.
> >
> > Will it work with data layed out as below?
> >
> > {
> >                           {
> >                            
> >                             {65'A',67'C',67'C',73'I',68'D',80'P',83'S',65'A',
> > 78'N',73'I',71'G',72'H',84'T'},
> >                            
> >                             {65'A',67'C',67'C',73'I',68'D',69'E',78'N',84'T',
> > 32' ',38'&',32' ',69'E',77'M',69'E',82'R',71'G',69'E',78'N',67'C',89'Y'},
> >                             {80'P',83'S',65'A'},
> >                             {78'N',73'I',71'G',72'H',84'T',32'
> >                             ',80'P',79'O',
> > 82'R',84'T',69'E',82'R'},
> >                             {},
> >                             {},
> >                             {},
> >                             1
> >                           },
> >                           {
> >                            
> >                             {65'A',76'L',73'I',83'S',79'O',68'D',65'A',86'V',
> > 73'I',83'S',65'A',47'/',78'N',85'U',77'M'},
> >                             {65'A',76'L',73'I',83'S',79'O',78'N'},
> >                             {68'D',65'A',86'V',73'I',83'S'},
> >                             {65'A',47'/',78'N',85'U',77'M',32'
> >                             ',67'C',65'A',
> > 82'R',68'D',73'I',65'A',67'C',32' ',67'C',65'A',84'T',72'H',32' ',76'L',
> > 65'A',66'B'},
> >                             {},
> >                             {},
> >                             {},
> >                             1
> >                           },
> >                           {
> >                            
> >                             {65'A',76'L',83'S',79'O',80'P',69'E',83'S',84'T',
> > 69'E',76'L',76'L',69'E',83'S',79'O',67'C',73'I',65'A'},
> >                             {65'A',76'L',83'S',79'O',80'P'},
> >                             {69'E',83'S',84'T',69'E',76'L',76'L',69'E'},
> >                             {83'S',79'O',67'C',73'I',65'A',76'L',32'
> >                             ',87'W',
> > 79'O',82'R',75'K'},
> >                             {},
> >                             {},
> >                             {},
> >                             0
> >                           }
> > }
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:42:13 +1000, Craig Welch
> > <euphoria at welchaviation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Tony Steward wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Kat but where do I find sorttok.
> > >
> > > It's part of her strtok, which you can download from
> > > http://www.tiggrbox.info/program/Euphoria.html#StrTok
> 
> Craig, yeas.
> Tony, no. The demos work on nested flat sequences, which you apparently
> do not have. Those 0 and 1 in the example above are atoms. Half your fields
> are empty. I don't know what you sorted them by, where's the code you used
> to attempt it?
> 
> What you posted above is NOT what you posted in your first enquiry:
> 
> >
> > {{"tony","nsw","Australia"},{"George","qld","Australia"},{"Mary","ca","USA"}}
> > ie: how do I sort by state or country
> 
> To compare your complaint that sorttok didn't work, this is what you seem to
> have tried:
> 
>
> {{"tony","nsw","Australia","","","",1},{"George","qld","Australia","","","",1},{"Ma
> ry","ca","USA","","","",0}}
> 
> And i would have said that i hadn't tried sorting atoms before, and no one had
> asked before. But i still don't know what you did.
> 
> Kat
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Regards
Tony Steward
www.locksdownunder.com

IF IT IS TO BE IT IS UP TO ME!

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu