Re: Fast appending and sorting of alot of short strings
On 9 Oct 2004, at 22:14, codepilot Gmail Account wrote:
>
>
> How abouts a call stack.
goto :end3
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 23:33:46 -0500, Kat <gertie at visionsix.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9 Oct 2004, at 21:17, codepilot Gmail Account wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > So would come from really be a good thing? Cause it just looks screwy,
> > > to me that is.
> >
> > goto :end2
> >
> > > On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 20:49:35 -0500, Kat <gertie at visionsix.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9 Oct 2004, at 15:29, codepilot Gmail Account wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What is goto good for, that for while prcedure function routineid cant
> > > > > do?
> > > >
> > > > goto :end
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 00:01:05 +0200, Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kat wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Perfect example of why global variables are sometimes a necessity
> > > > > > > for speed, even if some people claim they are bad programming
> > > > > > > practice. Ditto for "goto". Thanks, Pete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We don't know where to GOTO if we don't know where we've COME FROM.
> > > > > > http://www.fortran.com/fortran/come_from.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Juergen
> > > >
> > > > :end
> > > >
> > > > Getting to here, instead of top posting.
> > > > There were no conditionals, and no calls outside this email.
> > > >
> > > > Kat
> >
> > :end2
> > No, that page was a joke, it wasn't serious.
> >
> > But i still say it would be nice to have a way to know how one got to where
> > one is, like the built-in trace knows. I again vote we have some access to
> > that if we have "with trace" or some analog enabled.
> >
> >
> > Kat
Well, that *is* what i had asked for. Even tho it is limited to what called
functions and procedures. I'd think giving us access to the trace function in
the program would be just as easy?
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
