Re: Linux Torvalds on GPL2
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Sep 26, 2006
- 909 views
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:01:57 -0700, Ray Smith <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote: >Pete Lomax wrote: >> ><a >> >href="http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5627827397.html">http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5627827397.html</a> >> > >> Nice link. I love the quote: >> As an example, Torvalds then cites his own, self-made, original Linux >> source license, which basically said: "Give all source back, and never >> charge any money". It took me a few months, but I realized that the >> 'never charge any money' part was just asinine. It wasn't the point. >> The point was always "give back in kind". >> >> Probably because I've practically forced that >> > >I agree ... > >hence reason I'm pushing for a LGPL type license for Euphoria. >If Euphoria is released to the public domain or under a BSD type license it >allows people to use Euphoria without giving anything back. > >People makig there own closed source versions of Euphoria "won't" promote >Euphoria usage long term. > Have you (or anyone else) seen my licence? I haven't had any feedback at all on it yet. Regards, Pete http://palacebuilders.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/euphoria.html or more pertinent: http://palacebuilders.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/pfeat.htm#licence I'm sure you'll note this doc is not finalised, but the idea is there.