OpenEuphoria

Re: the fate of a euphorian

• Posted by Mark Brown <mabrown at SENET.COM.AU> Oct 12, 2000
• 498 views

Lewis wrote

> The translator
> is a good idea but how it got precedence over the addition of
> useful syntax, that discussed often, is beyond me.

I agree. It seems to me that the speedsters have received a little
more horsepower. I want a more confortable ride!

In particular....

1. Resolution of some of the problems related to dealing with calling
dll functions. I don't mind if the allocate / peek / poke thing is wrapped
internally somehow (perhaps preprocessed somehow?). It would be
nice to not have to worry about it before you start using the dll.

2. Namespaces

I wonder could Rob share some of what he is planning? The RDS site
seems to hint at moves in a new direction.
    "Better language support for resolving naming conflicts. A long list of
enhancements

     to both the language and its implementation."



All the best


Mark