Re: the fate of a euphorian

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bernie wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:52:07 -0400, Irv <irv at ELLIJAY.COM> wrote:
>
> >Interesting, isn't it - other than your first "wish", which is just a
> >programmer's convenience, all the others are logical extensions of a
> >language which brags about being based on "sequences". So logical, in fact,
> >that I find it hard to understand why they were not implemented long ago.
> >
>    Irv:
>
>    How about ( ie ++i ) preincrement before test on a for loop
>
>    Bernie

How would that work? After all, the for ...loop _automatically_ increments the
variable. How would you stop that action so you could pre-increment it?

Irv

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu