Re: the fate of a euphorian
- Posted by Irv <irv at ELLIJAY.COM> Oct 11, 2000
- 476 views
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bernie wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:52:07 -0400, Irv <irv at ELLIJAY.COM> wrote: > > >Interesting, isn't it - other than your first "wish", which is just a > >programmer's convenience, all the others are logical extensions of a > >language which brags about being based on "sequences". So logical, in fact, > >that I find it hard to understand why they were not implemented long ago. > > > Irv: > > How about ( ie ++i ) preincrement before test on a for loop > > Bernie How would that work? After all, the for ...loop _automatically_ increments the variable. How would you stop that action so you could pre-increment it? Irv