OpenEuphoria

RE: Inner loop compiler

• Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Sep 01, 2002
• 700 views

Hi, Barbarella.
I'm a bit confused regarding what you are proposing. For example, do you
think it is possible to write fast compiled code without using assembly? If
so, how? At least, that is what I understood when you say there is no need
for assembly programmers.
Regarding some other issues, like rand() or time() routines, I could help if
needed, at the assembly level.
By the way, maybe you can explain what is the use Rob assigns to the
remaining bit of integers (32 bits - 31 bits = 1 bit). If not, maybe Rob
will do .
Regards.
----- Original Message -----
From: <OthelloVivaldi at hotmail.com>
Subject: Inner loop compiler




Hi, Everybody!

Are anyone here interested in looking into the possibilities
of a minimalist, compiled machine oriented language to be used
with Euphoria?

I would like the language to generate small routines that could
interface with Euphoria and speed up the inner loops of programs.
I would prefer to give safety, speed and simple design priority.

I've attached a zipped text file that describes my ideas in a
little bit more detail. Please remember it's just unclear
thoughts so far, much have yet to be worked out.

It would extremely nice to hear your opinion!


Yours Sincerely,
Barbarella