Re: new Eu version, no built-in socks yet
- Posted by Everett Williams <rett at GVTC.COM> Nov 27, 1999
- 490 views
Robert Craig wrote: >Kat writes: >> Eu's lack of this caused a couple people to move from >> Eu to Rebol. > >I guess they don't mind that the Rebol interpreter is >44 times slower than Euphoria (factorial benchmark). With an Internet that loafs along at something less than 56k baud for most of us, Rebol's speed is irrelevant if it is only used for the Internet part of what I am doing. >> The thing is, i really need Eu for working code, >> and only a small part of Rebol's abilities for ease of connections. > >I certainly agree that Euphoria should have better >Internet capabilities. Another one for the wish list... > >Regards, > Rob Craig > Rapid Deployment Software > http://www.RapidEuphoria.com In reply to Brian Jackson's wish list.... Brian Jackson writes: > Does Euphoria support OLE/COM/ActiveX > (or whatever it's called THIS week)? Euphoria lets you access the WIN32 API at a low level. I guess in theory that lets you do almost anything, but there's currently no high-level support for OLE/COM/ActiveX > If not, are there plans to incorporate it into > EXW.EXE anytime soon? I wasn't planning anything, but if enough people lobby for it and/or explain how it should be done, I'm willing to consider it. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://www.RapidEuphoria.com As much as I would like to fight against it and use CORBA instead, it appears that Billy Boy has triumphed again with COM even showing up in Linux. As for OLE, it seems a bit premature when we don't even have a generalized call interface or any form of Eu modularity to be looking at support for a sophisticated and completely Windows based form of inter-process communication like OLE. But, it would be useful! On, Active/X, I draw the line in the sand. that particular piece of functionality is responsible for 90 percent of the security problems of IE. Why would we want it for Euphoria? In addition, Active/X is a completely Windows centric format. Ugh! Why not Euphoria as CGI, or Euphoria as JavaScript replacement, or Euphoria as JavaBean generator instead. Everett L.(Rett) Williams rett at gvtc.com