Re: new Eu version, no built-in socks yet

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Kat wrote:

> /me notes that
> http://www.rapideuphoria.com/refman.htm
> doesn't have any sock/ports commands like
> http://www.rebol.com/manual/netports.html
> does. sad
>
> Kat

Hmm... but that brings along one problem... (or so I think)

Implementing TCP support has its caveats... and the biggest one being
that if the support isn't secure, hackers/crackers/lamers can exploit
whatever programs, or language, for that matter, that uses the
implementations. Bad, bad thing.

And I can already see that the above paragragh is malformed, but to
figure it out, gotta think like me...

All in all, I generally disagree with TCP/port/socks/anything support
_into_ Euphoria. Outside of it offers more control, I would suppose,
especially with those whom release their source code. (See what happend
to Linux? Thats probably my best example)

w00 :)

--"LEVIATHAN"

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu