The notorious arm twister, Roderick Jackson just wrote:
>If you still have concerns about changing print(),
>perhaps a solution previously mentioned, a new routine
>(e.g., put()) could solve most ills from this. It wouldn't
>have to be a built-in; in fact, it would make sense to
>locate it in the GET.E file, along with get(). It could
>consist of nothing more than a call to print() and a call
>to puts() for the space.
A new routine! Give me a break, Rod. What are you going to
use the old one for? Wear it around your neck as a trophy?
jiri
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
