Re: ICON Solutions!
- Posted by Greg Phillips <i.shoot at REDNECKS.COM> Nov 17, 1999
- 517 views
Everett Williams wrote: [snip] > Since bound programs are distributable and constitute a modification to > the executable, I don't think that the license would forbid tacking the icons > onto the bound executable...and they should work without harming anything > unless part of the bind includes a length check( which something in the > back of my mind makes me think that I saw something on). I would think > RDS would be the final arbiter of this, though normal distribution process > would usually allow this sort of thing. > > Everett L.(Rett) Williams > rett at gvtc.com You're right: the interpreter does check the length, as well as the actual structure of the bound code. An example: try loading up a bound executable into a hex editor and change a value or two. You get the "One moment please..." message. So an icon tacked onto the end of the exe would render any program useless. *unless* you could figure out a way to fool the value checker. Which I'm sure is against the license =) Regards, Greg Phillips