OpenEuphoria

Re: Ideas for next Eu

• Posted by Irv Mullins <irv at ELLIJAY.COM> Nov 07, 1999
• 776 views

----- Original Message -----
From: simulat <simulat at INTERGATE.BC.CA>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 1999 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Ideas for next Eu

>
> This is not a trivial concern. In my practice, I find that it takes as
much
> effort to debug the programming overhead as it does to debug the program
> logic.
> In fact, it takes quite a bit more; the hassles I get when I move
functions
> from one library to another are entirely overhead problems, because the
> logic already works. I think that the effort spent in making the overhead
> work is a cost imposed on me by a flawed paradigm. The paradigm is to
> prevent logical errors by rigid programming practice enforced by the
> language. Maybe an entity like NASA needs to work with such a rigid
> paradigm, but I sure don't. It's just a bunch of stuff in the way.

Well, Martin, I think you'll like my new programming language. It does
away with all that "unnecessary overhead".
It has handy global variables that do not need to be declared in advance.
They use easy to remember names: 'A' thru 'Z'.
Right now, this paradigm-less language only runs on the TRS-80 model I,
but because of the great demand, no doubt it will soon be ported to the PC.

Irv