OpenEuphoria

Re: Re[2]: Are there any commercial applications written in Euphoria????

• Posted by "Hayden McKay" <hmck1 at dodo.com.au> Jan 29, 2004
• 467 views

The only problem is. A virus can attach itself very easily. But this goes
for all bound files useing interpreted languages.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "aku saya" <akusaya at gmx.net>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Are there any commercial applications written in
Euphoria????


>
>
> As for me, I use the binded program to distribute it (interpreter +
> scrambled source). I think it has an advantage too, because crackers
> will have difficult time finding unusual codes in the executable.
>
>
> s> Thanks to all who have replied. Just another question. Do they run
> s> Euphoria as an interpreted program and have to include Euphoria
> s> executable with their program, or do they compile it into a "C"
program?
> s> I hope I'm not being too much a pain, but Ray Smith saying he prefers
> s> Python got me wondering. I had looked at Python before I tried Euphoria
> s> and I thought Euphoria. The same went for Ruby, Perl, and Lua and
> s> others. I am used to COBOL, Cognos's Powerhouse, Visual Basic, Java,
> s> Sybase's Anywhere, Delphi, and a little C. (These are all costly and
> s> seem to have a lot of overhead so I am not interested in them).
> s> I was reading in a Java Pro magazine, December 2003, Editor's note page
> s> 6,  where it was not efficient for small systems, but for large
systems.
> s> The scripting languages are recommended(PHP) for smaller systems so
> s> that's where I thought maybe Euphoria's strength lay.
> s> Jim
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
> -- 
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.572 / Virus Database: 362 - Release Date: 28/01/04
>


---



--