Re: OOP vs Messaging (was Indigo on Wintel)
On 29 Jan 2004, at 7:30, Derek Parnell wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Nelson" <MichaelANelson at WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
> > Concluding that OOP is not a good tool because it works poorly in
> > inter-program communication is like concluding that a hammer is no good for
> > driving nails because it is useless for sawing boards.
>
> I'm in total agreement, Mike.
OOP's way of doing things included it's methods of communication. That's
the problem i have with it. Encapulating data and program code can be done
different ways, even in a mirc database. That's why M$ is moving away from
it. Or did imiss something (regardless of if M$ can gain more ownership
control over whatever they move to)? Otherwise, OOP isn't that much
different than over-hyped functions. Same as a vxd isn't any more than a over-
hyped dos device driver (click different buttons to compile differently).
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
