RE: Threads in Eu 2.5?
>From: CoJaBo <cojabo at suscom.net>
>Subject: Threads in Eu 2.5?
>
>I think threads are needed in Euphoria. The example below would be
>fairly easy to use. Many programs would benifit from this.
>procedure new_thread(integer routine_id,sequence params,int priority)
>new_thread() starts the thread and returns imediatly.
>
If threads are not quite make-able, then I think we would at least need
thread-safety. With the reduction in C code for the interpreter, I think
this might be more possible. Even if threads are not built-in, there are
still other libraries we can use for threads. So, what is certainly
necessary is thread-safety, which is the least of what's needed.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|