Re: RDMS Database's and/or Record Managers What good is
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:55:13 -0600, Kat <gertie at visionsix.com> wrote:
>On 23 Jan 2004, at 13:30, Pete Lomax wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 05:07:49 -0600, Kat <gertie at visionsix.com> wrote:
>> >( say something Lomax.... )
>> OK.
>>
>> You may not have written the disk access methods, or the memory
>> storage methods, used by euphoria programs. And you may not have said
>> the strtok lib made up a whole and complete database "system". But you
>> did say:
>>
>> >What do you want that is not already in strtok?
>
>And he didn't answer that. He went off talking about data storage methods,
>not data munging methods.
Hmm.
>From the original message you posted:
>On 22 Jan 2004, at 10:53, Isaac Raway wrote:
>> Business applications are lightweight on the actual code. What's
>> important is the database. That might be a bit trickier because there
>> aren't many available for Euphoria, but it is no reflection on the language.
>
>What do you want that is not already in strtok?
>
>Kat
Well I guess I missed the distinction there as well 
Pete
Assuming the worst from everyone is guaranteed to be a sound basis for
a self-fulfilling prophecy.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
