Re: RDMS Database's and/or Record Managers What good is Euphoria?

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "C. K. Lester" <euphoric at cklester.com>

> Euman wrote:
> 
> >>Is Euphoria powerful for business applications or just a play toy, not
> >>competing with Visual Basic or Delphi or?
> >>    
> >>
>  From my limited knowledge, I'd say that EUPHORIA is quite capable. 
> We've also got translation for added speed (if that ever were an issue).

That translated code is nowhere near as fast as hand coded C source.
 
> >Ray wrote:
> >When you have 500 or 1,000 tables and 20,000 programs it can be
> >difficult to track down how an invoice number got deleted when it
> >shouldn't have.
> >  
> >
> Not because of quantity, but because of algorithm.

In alot of cases yes, coders algorythm choice is very important
Im certain hand optimized C source is faster in most cases than Euphoria.

> >Euman wrote:
> >Can you see anything written useing euphoria's speed for large projects 
> >anyway?
> >  
> >
> Yep. With a proper algorithm/approach.

I cant...

> >Ray wrote:
> >I personally don't think Euphoria can handle large complex systems.
> >  
> >
> I disagree a little bit. It's usually the programmer that can't handle 
> the large, complex system. I do agree that some languages can't do 
> certain things, or can't do certain things efficiently, but I don't 
> agree that EUPHORIA has demonstrated itself to be one of these. Of 
> course, I'm not programming huge apps for global corporations. I am 
> creating many functional programs, however, much more efficiently than 
> if I used any other language. That's what's important to me, because if 
> my programs will look and work the same regardless of what language I 
> use, I gotta go then with what I find good to use. The important thing 
> these days to any programmer is ease of development.

Thats been argued here, Euphoria hasnt been pushed to the limit...
With the ever increasing processor speeds, Euphoria running programs
in a year will be faster than ASM now. So any huge program 'if started now'
will be much better off in the future. It could be further argued that in a year
32 bit O/S's will be a thing of the past...Anyone have a crystal ball?

Euman

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu