Re: RDMS Database's and/or Record Managers What good is Euphoria?
- Posted by "Euman" <euman at bellsouth.net> Jan 22, 2004
- 395 views
----- Original Message ----- From: "C. K. Lester" <euphoric at cklester.com> > Euman wrote: > > >>Is Euphoria powerful for business applications or just a play toy, not > >>competing with Visual Basic or Delphi or? > >> > >> > From my limited knowledge, I'd say that EUPHORIA is quite capable. > We've also got translation for added speed (if that ever were an issue). That translated code is nowhere near as fast as hand coded C source. > >Ray wrote: > >When you have 500 or 1,000 tables and 20,000 programs it can be > >difficult to track down how an invoice number got deleted when it > >shouldn't have. > > > > > Not because of quantity, but because of algorithm. In alot of cases yes, coders algorythm choice is very important Im certain hand optimized C source is faster in most cases than Euphoria. > >Euman wrote: > >Can you see anything written useing euphoria's speed for large projects > >anyway? > > > > > Yep. With a proper algorithm/approach. I cant... > >Ray wrote: > >I personally don't think Euphoria can handle large complex systems. > > > > > I disagree a little bit. It's usually the programmer that can't handle > the large, complex system. I do agree that some languages can't do > certain things, or can't do certain things efficiently, but I don't > agree that EUPHORIA has demonstrated itself to be one of these. Of > course, I'm not programming huge apps for global corporations. I am > creating many functional programs, however, much more efficiently than > if I used any other language. That's what's important to me, because if > my programs will look and work the same regardless of what language I > use, I gotta go then with what I find good to use. The important thing > these days to any programmer is ease of development. Thats been argued here, Euphoria hasnt been pushed to the limit... With the ever increasing processor speeds, Euphoria running programs in a year will be faster than ASM now. So any huge program 'if started now' will be much better off in the future. It could be further argued that in a year 32 bit O/S's will be a thing of the past...Anyone have a crystal ball? Euman