Re: A better way to do this?
- Posted by D. Newhall <derek_newhall at yahoo.com> Feb 26, 2005
- 555 views
Pete Lomax wrote: > Nonsense. Write test.e. Write a batch file: > copy test.e test2.e > copy test.e test3.e > ... > and run it every time you amend test.e. > Then you can include to your hearts content. True, but why should we have to do this? To have to manual copy include files and rename them or to run a script that does it before we can run our code is way too much work. If I add another "include foo as bar" then I need to run the script again to be able to test my program and clutter up my HD even more. Lack of re-includes I could probably tolerate but having two include files in different places on the harddrive with the same filename and only have one be included is just idiotic.