Re: A better way to do this?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Pete Lomax wrote:
> Nonsense. Write test.e. Write a batch file:
> copy test.e test2.e
> copy test.e test3.e
> ...
> and run it every time you amend test.e.
> Then you can include to your hearts content.

True, but why should we have to do this? To have to manual copy include files
and rename them or to run a script that does it before we can run our code is way
too much work. If I add another "include foo as bar" then I need to run the
script again to be able to test my program and clutter up my HD even more.

Lack of re-includes I could probably tolerate but having two include files in
different places on the harddrive with the same filename and only have one be
included is just idiotic.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu