OpenEuphoria

Re: A better way to do this?

• Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Feb 26, 2005
• 641 views

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:52:37 -0800, "Brent W. Hughes"
<guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:

<snip>
>This has to copy 10000 elements to make one little change.
obviously unacceptable, but the performance of option two should point
you in the right direction. How about a new include file:
>Here's the other solution:
>--****************************************
>sequence List
>------------------------------------------
global
>procedure Sub2()
>	List[900] = 5
>end procedure
>------------------------------------------
global
>procedure Sub1()
>	List = repeat(0,10000)
>	Sub2()
>end procedure
>------------------------------------------
>Sub1()
>--****************************************
>I don't really like giving List such a wide scope in this way.
Then List is private, but Sub1 & Sub2 are not.

Regards,
Pete