Re: A better way to do this?
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Feb 26, 2005
- 462 views
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:52:37 -0800, "Brent W. Hughes" <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote: <snip> >This has to copy 10000 elements to make one little change. obviously unacceptable, but the performance of option two should point you in the right direction. How about a new include file: >Here's the other solution: >--**************************************** >sequence List >------------------------------------------ global >procedure Sub2() > List[900] = 5 >end procedure >------------------------------------------ global >procedure Sub1() > List = repeat(0,10000) > Sub2() >end procedure >------------------------------------------ >Sub1() >--**************************************** >I don't really like giving List such a wide scope in this way. Then List is private, but Sub1 & Sub2 are not. Regards, Pete