Re: bits.e
- Posted by Brian Broker <bkb at cnw.com> Feb 20, 2005
- 425 views
jiri babor wrote: > > Brian Broker wrote: > > > > Hi Jiri, > > > > I can understand your gripe in this situation but it's also been discussed > > where some of us still using dialup don't want another copy of a big, but > > fairly commom, lib (like win32 libs) just to check out some code. > > > > If I was looking for bits.e, I would type "bits" into the archive search > > engine. (I'm not trying to be a jerk here, it's just my natural tendancy.) > > > > -- Brian > > > > Brian, I did search using 'bits.*' (with wildcard). No match found. My > mistake. jiri > No, it's RDS's mistake...