Re: Major Bug in Interpreter [Attn: Robert Craig]
- Posted by "Kat" <gertie at visionsix.com> Feb 15, 2005
- 465 views
On 15 Feb 2005, at 11:03, Robert Craig wrote: > > > posted by: Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> > > Georg Wrede wrote: > > Is it actually true that such a temporary, local, variable gets into > > the executable? One would think that it'd be optimised away? > > The time and space used by the extra variable are both > absolutely trivial, if not zero. Without the extra variable, > Euphoria would anyway have to create an internal temp variable > to hold the result. Ok, lets do that, and save the programmer time and effort remembering it. Kat