Re: private routines

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On Sun, 16 May 1999 09:27:57 GMT, Lionel Wong <eljay98 at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:

>I ask that Eu supports routines within routines (whether funcs, procs or
>types). This means that we would have global, local AND private routines.
>
>I'd like this because sometimes I have to write lots of repeated code for
>just one routine. The routine gets pretty long and less readable.
>
>Do you guys agree?
>
Pascal allows this. In the around 500,000 lines of pascal
I have written, I think I used this (private routine) once
or twice. I can't see that it simplifies things in any way.

Perhaps you should re-examine the structure of your code.
There's usually a better way that is not at first obvious.

I generally try to keep all routines to < 50 lines of code
(2 screens worth). That includes the "main". Whenever I
exceed those limits, I know I am writing poor, hacked, and
difficult to maintain code.

So no, I would prefer for Rob to work on better
namespacing, which is a more universal solution to this,
and other problems.


Regards,
Irv

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu