Database Theory & LINUX

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

One note about using Euphoria sequences as a database form.  One =
mistaken assumption is that the file is one huge sequence that must be =
read in at once.  Store Manager uses sequences as its database, but each =
record is a single sequence.  The program uses a while GET_SUCCESS loop =
to read in all the records it needs.  For now, since I want the whole =
database (they're small for now), I read it all in.  But later, I can =
easily change it to read a single record without changing the structure. =
 Also, new records are simply appended to the end of the file.  No =
commas should separate the records since they are completely separate =
sequences. =20
Drawback:  When editing a record, the entire file must be rewritten to =
disk.  While not difficult to implement, it is time-consuming for the =
user.  Please see previous posts in the archives regarding that topic.

[Linux]

I've had RedHat 4.1 Linux on my hard drive for a while.  I've noticed no =
real problems with it, but I don't use it that much either.  Most of my =
computer usage is for Euphoria which doesn't have an official Linux =
version yet ~8(.

Rob:  I will happily register in advance for the promise of a Linux =
version of Euphoria (with shared library accessibility, of course) if =
one can be released within the next year.  Please????

Michael J. Sabal
mjs at osa.att.ne.jp
http://home.att.ne.jp/gold/mjs/index.html

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu