Re: Re[2]: Euphoria CGI Success

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

I=B4m using EDB bases with 1GB size with no problems.

Rubens


At 18:35 12/2/2006, you wrote:
>
>
>posted by: Salix <salix at freemail.hu>
>
>Robert Craig wrote:
>>
>> akusaya wrote:
>> > Unless Eu has a library that is reliable and simple to use for
>> > - database (real database, not EDB that is easily corrupted)
>>
>> If EDB is easily corrupted, why have I not had any confirmed reports of
>> corruption? I know that a lot of people are using it. I have databases
>> that are years old and are updated every day, no problem.
>> database.e has been very stable since it was created a few years ago.=

>> I don't know of any bugs that would cause corruption. The only
>> temporary "corruption" that has been reported has been due to things lik=
e
>> copying a database from Windows to Linux in "text" mode.
>>
>
>I should agree with Rob as database.e serves my applications without probl=
em.=20
>I think it is more than enough for general web applications. But if you do=
n't=20
>like EDS you can use Tsunami or anything else...
>
>But there is a typical corruption I regulary meet. Although this is not re=
ally=20
>CGI related. I couldn't find a way to open EDB in read-only mode under Win=
dows.=20
>It did generated corrupt records... Very rarely but it happens at 250 regi=
stered=20
>users that they want to read/write the EDB at the same time.
>
>But maybe I just wasn't paid well enough to search hard enough for a final=

>solution... smile
>
>Regards,
>
>Salix
>
>
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu