Re: Re[4]: Euphoria CGI Success
I think Euphoria isn't as good as PHP or Perl for CGI related tasks since, as
pointed out, these were developed for the web.
At least in theory, I can't understand why Euphoria can't be as good as (or even
better than) PHP and Perl given the proper libraries are developed.
In relation with many processes running at the same time, I asked one or two
months ago if someone had used FASTCGI. Receiving no response I assumed no one
was using it. This resolves the problem of many processes open at the same time.
I think it would be a good idea to compile Euphoria with FASTCGI for those who
are developing for the web.
Please read: http://www.fastcgi.com/devkit/doc/fastcgi-whitepaper/fastcgi.htm
JG
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
