Re: Euphoria related! Sorta...
- Posted by Lucius Hilley III <lhilley at CDC.NET> Dec 27, 1998
- 483 views
FAT32 vs FAT16 ---- Battle of the century. I've been running FAT32 for sometime now and have seen no ill effects. I do have one large dissatisfaction with Win9x. That is both Win95 and Win98 and Probably Win NT. The Registry. If that thing gets screwed, you are usually screwed. Simply put, I have come close to reinstalling Win95 several times because of the registry files. I don't understand why Win9x thinks they must be loaded before the DOS like OS is loaded. My oppinion is that if the registry does get messed up that Win9x should still be able to load for the most part but with a WARNING that the registry is corrupt and supply help as to how to fix it. Good Luck _________________________ Lucius L. Hilley III lhilley at cdc.net http://www.cdc.net/~lhilley http://www.dragonvet.com _________________________ On Sun, 27 Dec 1998 09:00:52 -0600, Kevin Sieger <simkin at ZEBRA.NET> wrote: >For Xmas I got winbloze 98 (is that a gift or a curse?) and with some >refunds and gift money I'll be getting a Maxtor 8.4 GB HD next week too >(sweet). Installing the HD is a no brainer, but how about win98? >Anyone have particularly bad experiences with it and Euphoria? And >HAWKE', any bad news about it and EUServer? > >One more thing, is there any disadvantages to moving to the FAT32 vs >FAT16? I know if I keep FAT16, I'll have to partition the new drive >into 4 or so other drives, but then again that is a small price to pay >for anything that would harass me because of FAT32. > >I ask you guys cuz I trust you alot more than the ppls of usenet land... > >Thanks, > >Kevin