Re: Backups
- Posted by Martin Stachon <martin.stachon at worldonline.cz> Mar 29, 2002
- 381 views
Euman wrote: > Try running Linux on a i486 processor. > * SLOW, SLOW and way SLOW * It depends on how clever are you with configuring... yes I've seen 486/25 webserver booting in several mins, but Win NT/2000 wouldn't be any faster - Linux has better caching etc. I agree that is difficult to configure all the daemons etc. > Not to mention you have to keep recompiling the kernel > for everychange you make to your system. Not everytime - if you compile the drivers as modules, you can even put them in/out during run of the system. > Some people say that Linux is more stable and hardly crashes and I > say that when it does make a mistake it doesnt let you know until you > cant boot the O/S anymore. Watch logs - I redirected kernel messages to /dev/tty12 so I can see them easily... It is generally good idea to not use the hottest kernel version because of possible bugs (currently the 2.5.x tree) - recently 2.4.11 and 2.4.14 had some filesystem Oopses (I like the name - better than Windows' "Possibly you might continue properly" [Cz->En]), but the kernels put into distributions are well tested (Debian is usually the most conservative) Martin (I am not a Linux GURU at all, but my dream is to once have a line in the kernel, difficult to do with Euphoria, isn't it? Oh, EuOS)