RE: A question about certain language features
Derek Parnell wrote:
> For example, I seriously wish the win32lib.ew did not have all
> those onXXX sequences globally available. It has made serious
> issues with expanding its functionality.
Uh, since when has backward compatibility been an issue with a product
that hasn't even been "released" yet? I say ONWARD with efficiency...
damn the past! damn the broken code! They all know that it is
pre-release alpha/beta code!
Just my $0.02. Where's my change?
> cannot assume inside the library that somebody using the library
> hasn't altered the values at any time.
Don't worry about what's been done, because it's not in concrete yet
anyway... or izzit? Change up the library and gives us something sleek
and efficient if you want. That's the nature of technological
advancement.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
