RE: Sequence Slicing (Was RE: Tough ciphers?)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

bensler at mail.com wrote:
> The problem that Derek is pointing out, is that you still
> have to slice your sequence to do consecutive finds.

I guess what he's suggesting is "give us an optimized find on a slice," 
right?

Rob, why not?! :)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu