Re: $100 Contest Question
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net Mar 04, 2002
- 462 views
----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Parnell" <ddparnell at bigpond.com> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> > > Euman's hashtable runs at 1.16 but I tweaked that a lot and got it to run at > 0.22 Yes you did, thanks BIG D When "I" changed this: h *= 16 to this: h *= 3 -- which doesnt give as Unique a value as before but is still very effective. The routine was @250% faster bringing the time from 3.5 sec on my 233mhz to 1.1 sec This is the routine I was talking about sharing in a month or so. But when BIG D convinced me that getc( ) would shave another 0.25 sec off the load time. I was impressed. He also went a few steps further and now EumsHash runs in at 0.60 sec on my 233mhz laptop ( at 200mhz desk). I can imagine figures on PIII 500 or higher machine being (0.0something) or better now. Prolly could beat Junko's Spellchecker I havent coded this so Im not sure. sure is BLAZING FAST! Euman