Re: $100 Contest Question
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Mar 03, 2002
- 461 views
On 4 Mar 2002, at 13:51, Derek Parnell wrote: > > 4/03/2002 1:09:21 PM, Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> wrote: > > > > >On 3 Mar 2002, at 20:55, euman at bellsouth.net wrote: > > > >> > >> Kat did you try my posted routine yet? > > > >No, was i supposed to? I did try code Derek posted 3days ago, it ran 10x to > >20x > >slower on my computer than on his. > > > > Kat, > the purpose of that post was to see if it would run faster on your machine > than > the code you were currently using, not to see if your machine was slower than > mine or not. By the sounds of it, the code I posted (using getc() rather than > get()) is heaps faster for you. You'd think so, but code Jiri posted last month ran *much slower* using getc() than gets() or get(). Kat