RE: A Euphoria DLL?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Jonas  Temple wrote:
> Andy,
> 
> It doesn't make sense in that I really don't want to have to fight with 
> a C compiler to get my Euphoria code into a .dll.  I certainly could do 
> that (I have Borland C++ 5.something floating around on my hard drive 
> somewhere) but it would be nice to not have to use the compiler.
> 

Well, ok, but I don't understand why it would be a "fight".  I am 
*completely* C illiterate, and every time I try to use any compiler to 
do anything OTHER than Euphoria stuff, I can't get it to work.

BUT, I make Euphoria .exe's and .dll's with the translator & Borland (& 
now Watcom, thanks to Euman) all the time without a hitch.  How is 
typing "emake" a fight?

All of these other methods people are trying to come up with seem 
incredibly more complicated...

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu