RE: A Euphoria DLL?
- Posted by Andy Serpa <renegade at earthling.net> Mar 01, 2002
- 527 views
Jonas Temple wrote: > Andy, > > It doesn't make sense in that I really don't want to have to fight with > a C compiler to get my Euphoria code into a .dll. I certainly could do > that (I have Borland C++ 5.something floating around on my hard drive > somewhere) but it would be nice to not have to use the compiler. > Well, ok, but I don't understand why it would be a "fight". I am *completely* C illiterate, and every time I try to use any compiler to do anything OTHER than Euphoria stuff, I can't get it to work. BUT, I make Euphoria .exe's and .dll's with the translator & Borland (& now Watcom, thanks to Euman) all the time without a hitch. How is typing "emake" a fight? All of these other methods people are trying to come up with seem incredibly more complicated...