OpenEuphoria

RE: A Euphoria DLL?

• Posted by Jonas Temple <jktemple at yhti.net> Mar 01, 2002
• 519 views

The only real difference from an Eu perspective is that code you intend 
to be in a .dll would have to be created as a .dll first before running 
the interpreter against the main code.  In other words, no interpreter 
for code intended to be a part of a .dll.  I may be speaking out of turn 
here (Rob) but it seems logical to me.  This isn't really anything 
new...C programmers have to do this all the time.

Jonas
Matthew Lewis wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernie Ryan [mailto:xotron at localnet.com]
> 
> > Matt:
> >    A bound program is just the executable interpeter with
> >    a executable program code bound on to the backend of it.
> >    This would be very different than creating a DLL.
> 
> Different, yes, but how much different?  Rather than lumping Eu code to 
> the
> normal, executable interpreter, it would be bound to a dll-compiled 
> version.
> The bind utility would then adjust the stub to reflect the entry points 
> for
> the dll.  Again, other than figuring out the proper structure for the 
> entry
> points, I don't see why this would be too difficult. :)
> 
> Matt Lewis
> 
>