Re: bigot & truecolor library

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

At the risk of drawing fire:

It is usually pretty hard to get people to
contribute time, code, etc. to something like
Euphoria.  Therefore I prefer to let the market
decide what is most useful and what is not.  I
suggest that you (and I) support those bits of
code we find useful and valuable and we ignore
those that we do not.

I have been a coder for more than 30 years, but I am
a newbie to Euphoria, so I have been lurking here
gaining from most of the postings and simply
discarding those that do not impress me.  I do not
want to run off the guy who may help me with my
web page reader just because I have no use for
his brass widget twister.

Truly no offense intended.

-Flash->

> ----------
> From:         jiri babor[SMTP:jbabor at PARADISE.NET.NZ]
> Sent:         Thursday, November 05, 1998 8:38 PM
> To:   EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
> Subject:      bigot & truecolor library
>
> Sorry, C&KL, I am not even going to reply to your sick little
> outburst, so typical of your kind, but let me see how many more people
> I can antagonize in a single day...
>
> Hey, Hawke, sorry, but its your turn now, you are a bit more of a
> challenge...
>
> For me, being truly colorblind, it is really imperative to have
> sixteen million colors at my fingertips! When I tried the first
> release of your (?) truecolor library, nothing worked. I had a look
> under the bonnet and what I saw did not really inspire my confidence,
> so I put it aside.
>
> A little bit later, in a blaze of publicity, you announced a new
> version, better and smarter. Being a bit of a sucker as well as
> colorblind, I tried again. And again nothing seemed to work. Oh
> well...
>
> But now, a patch later, we can at least run Irv's example - your
> self-congratulatory style and obvious propensity to overestimate your
> own successes don't seem to interfere too much with your ability to
> learn. (That's a compliment!)
>
> Seriously, the idea of having a separate, external program to
> initialize a video mode is not a winner (can I put it any more
> diplomatically?), I think a lot of people will have trouble with it.
> After all, one should be able to change to various other modes or
> resolutions from within a single program.
>
> OTHERWISE IT'S STARTING TO LOOK QUITE GOOD! THANKS.
>
> jiri
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu